Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37 (0.26 seconds)

Pryag Ahir And Ors. vs Mahabir Ahir on 24 April, 1922

The decision in the case of Magnu Ahir (supra) proceeds on the basis that the land does not cease to be agricultural so long as it is held for the purpose of agriculture and even if a Sirdar raises constructions on the land held by him, it cannot be said that the provisions of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act ceases to have an application thereto. Now whether the land is being used for agricultural purposes or not can be decided only at a trial of the Suit or when the objections raised by the defendants relating to the jurisdiction is taken up for disposal.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next