Shiv Sarup Gupta vs Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta on 30 July, 1999
5. Shiv Sarup Gupta Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta AIR 1999 SC 2507
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.42 seconds)Section 25 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Ram Dass vs Ishwar Chander And Others on 9 May, 1988
5. Ram Dass Vs. Ishwar Chander & Ors (1988) 3 SCC 131
Sarla Ahuja vs United India Insurance Company Ltd on 27 October, 1998
6. Sarla Ahuja Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. (1998) 8 SCC 119
7 Per contra, it is argued by Ld. counsel for respondents that
there is no bonafide requirement of petitioner as alleged as there is no
comparison with the premises where he is living at present as
compared to the tenanted premises. The petitioner has no plans to live
in the tenanted premises which is in a very dilapidated condition and
is being used since prepartition era for the use of the servants . Even
today the same is in occupation of the servants of respondents. The
petitioner who has been an Ambassador of India in various other
countries and who is living in the most expensive locality i.e Golf Links
at present would never like to live in a premises which has always been
and in occupation of the servants, hence the need is malafide, with the
ulterior motive, only to get the premises vacated.
Freddy Fernandes vs P.L. Mehra on 3 January, 1973
1. Freddy Frernandes Vs. P L Mehra ILR (1973) I Delhi
Precision Steel And Engineering Works ... vs Prem Deva Niranjan Deva Tayal on 7 October, 1982
2. Precision Steel & Engineering Vorks Vs. Prem DevaNiranjan Deva Tayal AIR
(1982) SC 1518
Nanalal Goverdhandas & Co. And Ors. vs Samratbai Lilachand Shah on 18 March, 1980
4. Nandlal Goverdhandas & Co. Vs. Smt. Samratbai Lilachand Shah AIR 181
Bombay 1.
Inderjeet Kaur vs Nirpal Singh on 15 December, 2000
Inderjeet Kaur Vs. Nirpal Singh (2001) 1 SCC 706
Kishan Chand vs Jagdish Pershad And Ors. on 16 October, 2001
7. Kishan Chand Vs. Jagdish Pershad & Ors (2003) 9 SCC 151
8 Heard Ld. counsels for the parties and perused the
complete record file. Under section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent
Control Act, a landlord/land lady will be entitled to an order of
eviction, if, he/she is able to show that
Satyawati Sharma (Dead) By Lrs vs Union Of India & Another on 16 April, 2008
(a) the premises in question were let out for residential purpose or
commercial purposes [as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Satyawati Sharma v. Union of India and
another, 148 (2008) DLT 705 (SC),]