Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 39 (0.56 seconds)The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Section 13 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
The Recovery Of Debts Due To Banks And Financial Institutions Act, 1993
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 17 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 July, 1994
5. Hitendra Vishnu Thakur V. State of Maharashtra,
(1994)4 SCC 602:
K.S. Paripoornan vs State Of Kerala on 12 September, 1994
6. K.S. Paripoornan v. State of Kerala, (1994)5 SCC 593:
Delhi Cotton And General Mills Co. vs The Income Tax Commissioner on 26 July, 1927
In support of this contention,
learned counsel for the appellant rightly invited our
attention to a decision of the Privy Council in Delhi Cloth
and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT, AIR 1927 PC 242 wherein
it has been laid down that
"while provisions of a statute dealing merely with
matters of procedure may properly, unless that
construction be textually inadmissible, have
retrospective effect attributed to them, provisions
which touch a right in existence at the passing of
the statute are not to be applied retrospectively in
the absence of express enactment or necessary
intendment".
Shyam Sunder And Others vs Ram Kumar And Another on 31 July, 2001
8. Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar, (2001) 8 SCC 24.