Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.66 seconds)
Sai Baba Institute Of Nursing Nawab ... vs Indian Nursing Council on 11 May, 2020 cites

The Karnataka State Association Of The ... vs Indian Nursing Council on 11 September, 2017

It is further contended that the Indian Nursing Council has no legal right to grant recognition as has been held by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.12759-12761 of 2017 - The Karnataka State Association of the Management of Nursing and Allied Heath Science Institutions and others Vs. Indian Nursing Council and others, wherein it has been held that "the Indian Nursing council has no authority to grant recognition to the institutions imparting nursing courses." Further, an intimation dt.20.04.2018 was sent by the Indian Nursing Council in the nature of guidelines and minimum requirements, which reads thus :
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 34 - Full Document

National Council For Teacher Edn. & Anr vs Venus Public Education Society & Ors on 1 November, 2012

"33. Now, to the last plank of submission of the learned counsel for the respondent. It is urged by him that NCTE had procrastinated its decision at every stage and such delay was deliberate and, therefore, the Society was compelled to admit the students and impart education, regard being had to the fact that there were really no deficiencies. As has been laid down in many a pronouncement of this Court that without recognition from NCTE and affiliation from the university/examining body, the educational institution cannot admit the students. An educational institution is expected to be aware of the law. The students who take admission are not young in age. They are graduates. They are expected to enquire whether the institution has recognition and affiliation. If we allow ourselves to say so, the institution had given admission in a nonchalant manner. Possibly, its functionaries harboured the idea that they had incomparable fertile mind. The students who had taken admission possibly immersed with the idea that ignorance is a bliss. It is also necessary to state that the institution had the anxious enthusiasm to commercialise education and earn money forgetting the factum that such an attitude leads to a disaster. The students exhibited tremendous anxiety to get a degree without bothering for a moment whether their error, if any, had sanctity of law. Such attitudes only bring nemesis. It would not be wrong to say that this is not a case which put the institution or the students to choose between Scylla and Charybdis. On the contrary, both of them were expected to be Argus-eyed. The basic motto should have been "transparency".
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 100 - D Misra - Full Document
1