Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.60 seconds)Sh Arman Sindhu vs Union Of India & Ors. on 18 August, 2021
5.1. On the other hand, learned advocate
Mr.Krutik Parikh submitted that the issue arising
in these petitions are now covered by the
judgments of the Madras High Court as well as the
Delhi High Court. Reliance was placed on the
decision of the Madras High Court dated 9th
August, 2021 in Writ Petition No.16526 of 2021
and other allied matters in case of GA Vishwajeet
Vs. Union of India and Others as well as the
decision of the Delhi High Court dated 18th
August, 2021 in Writ Petition No.8429 of 2021 in
case of SH ARMAN SINDHU Vs. Union of India and
Ors.
Dr Rajat Duhan & Ors vs All India Institute Of Medical Sciences ... on 22 November, 2019
The impermissibility
of such interference with academic assessments has been
emphasised in the Division Bench decisions of this Court in
Dr. Rajat Duhan and Others vs. All India Institute of Medical
Sciences and Others11 and National Board of Examinations vs.
Dr. Rajani Sinha and Others12.
Dolly Chhanda vs Chairman, Jee & Ors on 5 October, 2004
14. It is also relevant to note that the appellant has not
chosen to challenge the time limits prescribed and fixed
in the Information Bulletin. In any event, she has not
made out any case to demonstrate that the procedure
prescribed in the Information Bulletin is violative of
Article 14 of the Constitution of India and suffers from
the vice of arbitrariness. Knowing that she was ineligible
to get admission in terms of the relevant Rules and
Regulations, the appellant still proceeded to take part in
Page 8 of 10
Downloaded on : Sun Jan 16 12:50:04 IST 2022
C/SCA/11773/2021 ORDER DATED: 07/09/2021
the counseling conducted for seats reserved under All
India quota and also in the counselling conducted by the
State of Uttar Pradesh for filling up the seats which are
reserved for State quota." As noted above, the Supreme
Court declined to interfere with the said judgment of the
Division Bench."
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ga Vishwajeet vs Union Of India on 9 August, 2021
5.1. On the other hand, learned advocate
Mr.Krutik Parikh submitted that the issue arising
in these petitions are now covered by the
judgments of the Madras High Court as well as the
Delhi High Court. Reliance was placed on the
decision of the Madras High Court dated 9th
August, 2021 in Writ Petition No.16526 of 2021
and other allied matters in case of GA Vishwajeet
Vs. Union of India and Others as well as the
decision of the Delhi High Court dated 18th
August, 2021 in Writ Petition No.8429 of 2021 in
case of SH ARMAN SINDHU Vs. Union of India and
Ors.
National Board Of Examinations vs Dr Rajani Sinha & Ors on 26 March, 2021
The impermissibility
of such interference with academic assessments has been
emphasised in the Division Bench decisions of this Court in
Dr. Rajat Duhan and Others vs. All India Institute of Medical
Sciences and Others11 and National Board of Examinations vs.
Dr. Rajani Sinha and Others12.
Ojasvini Agrawal vs Union Of India on 22 June, 2020
5.2. Relying upon the aforesaid decisions, it was
submitted that the Delhi High Court has referred
to the decision of the Madras High Court and
after considering the arguments of both the sides
dismissed the petition. It was submitted that the
Delhi High Court has also considered the decision
in case of Ojasvini Agrawal Vs. Union of India
decided on 13th May, 2020 in Writ Petition No.3054
of 2020 of the Delhi High Court which was
affirmed by the Division Bench vide judgment
dated 27th May, 2020 in Letters Patent Appeal
No.147 of 2020 and has held as under :
1