Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.42 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
New Prakash Transport Co. Ltd vs New Suwarna Transport Co. Ltd on 30 September, 1956
In New Prakash Transport Company, Ltd. v. New Sawarna Transport Company Ltd., this Court reviewed the case-law on the subject and came to the conclusion that the rules of natural justice vary with varying constructions of statutory bodies, and the rules prescribed by the legislature under which they have to act, and the question whether in a particular case they have been contravened must be judge not by any preconceived notion of what they may be but in the light of the provisions of the relevant Act.
Union Of India vs T. R. Varma on 18 September, 1957
52. Rules of natural justice have been sufficiently adumbrated in another pronouncement in the same volume in Union of India v. T. R. Varma [1958 - II L.L.J. 259] as follows :-
Nagendra Nath Bora & Another vs The Commissioner Of Hills Divisionand ... on 7 February, 1958
This Court re-affirmed the principle in Nagendra Nath v. Commissioner of Hills Division :
Gullapalli Nageswara Rao And Others vs Andhra Pradesh State Road ... on 5 November, 1958
In the same volume at p. 1376, in the second case under Motor Transport, in Nageswara Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh , their lordships observed as follows :
All India Bank Employees vs National Industrial Tribunal & ... on 28 August, 1961
65. The next contention of the petitioners is that rule 4(A) itself is ultra vires of the Constitution. It is contended that, simply because an employee is a Government employee, he cannot be denied the right guaranteed to every citizen under Art. 19 of the Constitution and other articles. This proposition cannot be disputed. What is to be found, however, is whether a right to form an association which is guaranteed under Art. 19(1)(c) of the Constitution, also carries with it a concomitant or incidental right to make the activity of the association or the demands of the association effective by resort to strike. Such a contention, which was raised and was examined by their lordships of the Supreme Court, has been repelled and we need only make a reference to the decision of their lordships in the case in All-India Bank Employees' Association v. National Industrial Tribunal [1961 - II L.L.J. 385].
Kameshwar Prasad And Others vs The State Of Bihar And Another on 22 February, 1962
66. But it is contended that another decision of the Supreme Court has affirmed the right of the employees to a peaceful demonstration. For this proposition, reliance is placed on another recent decision of the Supreme Court in Kameshwar Prasad v. State of Bihar [1962 - I L.L.J. 294].