Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 28 (0.86 seconds)Section 58 in The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016
Section 92 in The Bihar Prohibition And Excise Act, 2016 [Entire Act]
Md. Sharafat Ali @ Sarafat Ali & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 14 September, 2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner invites our
Patna High Court CWJC No.9559 of 2020 dt.21-12-2020
15/24
attention to our earlier order dated 09.01.2020 passed in
CWJC No. 20598 of 2019, titled as Md. Shaukat Ali Vs.
The State of Bihar& Ors., and wants the petition to be
disposed of in terms thereof.
Mahendra Manjhi & Ors vs State Of Bihar on 4 April, 2011
(iv) order dated 12.02.2018 passed in
CWJC No.2437 of 2018 titled as Mahendra Manjhi
Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.;
Laxman Das @ Lakshman Ravidas vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 February, 2018
(v) judgement dated 12.02.2018 passed
in CWJC No.2470 of 2018 titled as Laxman Das @
Lakshman Ravidas Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.;
Bikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 29 June, 2020
(vii) order dated 27.03.2018 passed in
CWJC No.5528 of 2018 titled as Bikash Kumar Vs.
The State of Bihar & Ors.;
Section 340 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Umesh Prasad Sah & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 26 June, 2018
In Umesh Sah (supra), this Court had clarified
Patna High Court CWJC No.9559 of 2020 dt.21-12-2020
20/24
that the expression "reasonable delay" under Section 58 of
Chapter 6 of the Act has to be construed to be 'not more
than three months'.