Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.35 seconds)

Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978

Page No.# 6/8 (1) Had the entry been communicated to him he would know about the assessment of his work and conduct by his superiors, which would enable him to improve his work in future; (2) he would have an opportunity of making a representation against the entry if he feels it is unjustified, and pray for its upgradation. Hence, non-communication of an entry is arbitrary, and it has been held by the Constitution Bench decision of this Court in Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India that arbitrariness violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 134 - Cited by 1982 - M H Beg - Full Document
1