Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)
Harish Kumar vs Gulshan Kumar on 2 May, 2017 cites

Munshi Ram And Others vs Delhi Administration on 27 November, 1967

The Court after detailed discussion and following the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases of Babu Lal v. Raj Kumar, 1996(2) RRR 109 (SC) : J.T. (1996) 2716, Munshi Ram and Ors. v. Delhi Administration, A.I.R. 1968 Supreme Court 702, B. Gangadhar v. B.G. Rajalingam, A.I.R. 1996 S.C. 790 : 1995(3) RRR 1888 (SC) and noticing judgments of various High Court held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 489 - K S Hegde - Full Document

B. Gangadhar vs B.G. Rajalingam on 12 May, 1995

The Court after detailed discussion and following the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases of Babu Lal v. Raj Kumar, 1996(2) RRR 109 (SC) : J.T. (1996) 2716, Munshi Ram and Ors. v. Delhi Administration, A.I.R. 1968 Supreme Court 702, B. Gangadhar v. B.G. Rajalingam, A.I.R. 1996 S.C. 790 : 1995(3) RRR 1888 (SC) and noticing judgments of various High Court held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 60 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Naresh Kumar vs Narinder Singh And Another on 14 September, 2011

The appeal has also been dismissed on the ground that the appellant had himself appeared as a witness in support of the earlier ejectment application on behalf of the tenant to plead that possession was with him and now he cannot turn around to say that he had a independent right of retaining the possession having failed to prove the factum of partnership. Resultantly, reliance was placed upon the judgment passed in 'Naresh Kumar Vs. Narinder Singh and another' 2012 (1) PLR 119 that it is not necessary to frame issues.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - A K Mittal - Full Document

Babu Lal vs Raj Kumar & Ors on 11 March, 2013

The Court after detailed discussion and following the principles enunciated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases of Babu Lal v. Raj Kumar, 1996(2) RRR 109 (SC) : J.T. (1996) 2716, Munshi Ram and Ors. v. Delhi Administration, A.I.R. 1968 Supreme Court 702, B. Gangadhar v. B.G. Rajalingam, A.I.R. 1996 S.C. 790 : 1995(3) RRR 1888 (SC) and noticing judgments of various High Court held as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - J Singh - Full Document
1