Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.69 seconds)
The National Insurance Co., Ltd., vs G.Narayana Reddy S/O Sambaiah on 8 November, 2011 cites

B.V. Nagaraju vs M/S. Oriental Insurance Co. ... on 20 May, 1996

5. The District Forum has allowed the complaint on the premise that non-intimation of the accident within the stipulated time is not mandatory but directory in the light of decision of Tamil Nadu State Commission and overloading of the vehicle is not fundamental breach of contract in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in B.V.Nagarjau Vs Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd., II CPJ 18 (SC),1997.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 297 - M M Punchhi - Full Document

Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. ... vs Mohd. Yasin Khan And Ors. on 6 August, 2001

10. As per the judgment of the National Commission in New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs A Mohamad Yasin (14.08.1995) it was ruled that a settlement offer on non-standard basis cannot be the foundation for a direction against the insurance company for settlement of the claim or holding the insurance company guilty of any deficiency in service within the meaning of Consumer Protection Act. (para 4 of the order).
Patna High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 7 - S N Pathak - Full Document

G. Kothainachiar vs The Branch Manager, United India ... on 29 October, 2007

Secondly, the National Commission, in its order dated 29th October 2007, in G Kothainachiar vs The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., and Others has taken note of the policy framed by the General Insurance Corporation of India with regard to settlement of non-standard claims in case of breach of policy of terms and warranties and has confirmed that such settlements would essentially inter alia cover claims were the breaches are of a technical or minor and not serious breaches.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 10 - Cited by 46 - Full Document

Nic Ltd (Dm) And Another vs Sh. Suresh Kumar Sharma on 2 April, 2007

In Suresh Babus case the National Commission held that the insurance company was justified in repudiating the claim when the driver of the insured vehicle permitted 36 passengers against the bus having capacity to carry 17 passengers plus one driver and one conductor and the driver of the insured vehicle had driven it recklessly at high speed which dashed from behind the vehicle which was parked on the road side.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1