Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.50 seconds)

Siddarth Gupta vs The Delhi Golf Club Limited & Anr on 18 December, 2015

communicated to her; (iii) she was not informed of any proposed actions; and (iv) she was not granted a hearing to respond. The decision is therefore illegal, having been made in complete disregard of the principles of natural justice. The Plaintiff relies on the judgment in Siddharth Gupta v. The Delhi Golf Club Limited & Anr.,16 which emphasized the need for natural justice in membership termination.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M Singh - Full Document

Mr. Charles Mantosh And Others vs Mr. Dalhousie Institute And Others on 25 September, 1992

Similarly, the judgments in Charles Mantosh & Ors. v. Dalhousie Institute & Ors.,25 and Jagdish Chander Sachdeva v. Royal Bombay Yacht Club & Ors.,26 has also been relied upon by the Plaintiffs. However, the facts of these cases are distinguishable and do not apply to the present situation. In Jagdish Chander Sachdeva, the Appellant, a permanent club member, was expelled for failing to move to alternate accommodations while his original premises were under repair, without being given a hearing, as per Rule 43(vii) of the Club Rules.
Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next