Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (3.14 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Asstt. Excise Commissioner vs Issac Peter on 22 February, 1994
------------------------------------------------------------
*Reference may also be made to the decision of this Court in
Assistant Excise Commissioner V. Issac Peter [1994 (4)S.C.C.
104].
State Bank Of Patiala & Ors vs S.K.Sharma on 27 March, 1996
Bank of Patiala v. S.K. Sharma [1996 (3) S.C.C 364] and in
Krishanlal v. State of Jammu and Kashmir [1994 (4)
S.C.C. 422] on the basis of a large number of decision on
the subject. Though the said decisions were rendered with
reference to the statutory Rules and statutory provisions
(besides the principles of natural justice) governing the
disciplinary enquiries involving government servants and
employees of statutory corporation, the principles
adumbrated therein are of general application. It is
necessary to keep these considerations in mind while
deciding whether any interference is called for by the Court
whether under Article 226 or in a suit. The function of the
Court is not a mechanical on. It is always a considered
course of action.
1