Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.23 seconds)

State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) vs Sumit Kumar Verma on 10 November, 2014

Once a juvenile has been extended a protective umbrella under The Juvenile Act, 2000, the respondents are estopped from cancellation of applicant's candidature for appointment as Constable (exe.) under the garb of registration of criminal case against him wherein he had been acquitted of all the charges. This view, as per the applicant, has also been affirmed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in GNCTD vs. Sumit Kumar's (supra).
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Ramesh Bishnoi on 8 May, 2018

5.3. This aspect was emphasized by the Supreme Court in a judgment rendered in Union of India and others versus Ramesh Bishnoi (2019) 19 SCC 710, where the appointment of the concerned persons, i.e., one Ramesh Bishnoi was cancelled on the ground that a criminal case had been lodged against him under the provisions of Sections 354, 447 and 509 of the IPC. In this case as well, at the time when the alleged offence was committed, Ramesh Bishnoi was well below eighteen years of age.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next