Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Ramesh And Ors. vs Pawan Kumar on 6 February, 1998
The observance of the Court in Pawan Kumar's case (supra) in fact go a long way against the pleaded case of the petitioner. The following observations of the Court would be relevant to be referred at this stage :--
Sohan Lal vs Surinder And Anr. on 6 January, 1995
12. Learned counsel for the petitioners referred to the judgment of this Court in the case of Sohan Lal v. Surinder, (1995) 1 Pun LR 759, to argue that the report of the local commissioner is favourable to the petitioners and\ no nuisance is being created by them and as such the injunction granted to the respondents herein ought to be vacated. In this case, admittedly the shop was being
run in a commercial area and it was the next shopkeeper who had raised complaint about running the machine in the adjacent shop. The controversies alike the present, did not arise in that case probably both shops were working with due permission of Municipality and Shops Establishment Act. Thus, that case, on facts and law, has no application to the present case.
Section 6 in The Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 129 in The Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 [Entire Act]
1