Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)

State Rep. By Inspector Of Police & Ors vs N.M.T. Joy Immaculate on 5 May, 2004

9. On a careful perusal of the above provision, for issuance of summons the same can be issued for attendance of witness who resides within the limit of the police station jurisdiction or any adjoining station. Further on a perusal of the Section makes it very clear that the issuance of the summons under Section 160 Cr.P.C. applies only to the cases of persons who appears to be acquainted with the Page 4 / 11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14796 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.8201of 2022 facts and circumstances of the case, who are only witness or possible witnesses. Once the FIR has been registered as against the accused, summons cannot be issued against the accused under Section 160 Cr.P.C.for requiring his attendance for an accused person with a view to answering the charge made against him, as held by the Apex Court in State vs NMT Joy Immaculate reported in AIR 2004 SC 2282 .
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 60 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Preetham vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 31 August, 2021

In support of his submissions he also placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in V.N. Pachaimuthu vs. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram [2012(3) CTC 291] and the order passed by this Court in Benjamin vs. The Superintendent of Police [Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9821 of 2017 dated 05.09.2019] and Preetham vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police and another [ Crl.O.P.No.15000 of 2021 dated 31.08.2021] .
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - N Kumar - Full Document

V.N.Pachaimuthu vs The Superintendent Of Police on 9 March, 2012

In a Crl.O.P.this Court is accepting the view of the V.N. Pachaimuthu's case (supra) and quashed the summons with a liberty to the police to proceed further with the case and deal with the complaint in accordance with the guidelines given by the Honourable Apex Court in Lalitha Page 5 / 11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14796 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.8201of 2022 Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh [2013 (6) CTC 353].
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - V K Sharma - Full Document
1