cites: 113248016

1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)

M/S. Sheel International Ltd vs Kulbhushan Sood on 7 August, 2010 cites

Rajghria Paper Mills Ltd. vs The General Manager, Indian Security ... on 31 January, 2000

In my view, in the facts and circumstances of this case, the plaintiff cannot derive any advantage from the above decision in the matter of said K.L. Rajgaria being authorised to file the present suit on behalf of the plaintiff company.

Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 64 - K S Gupta - Full Document

The Court-fees Act, 1870

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 9073

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

The Specific Relief Act, 1963

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 10149

The Companies Act, 1956

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 77930

Section 7 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 266

United Bank Of India vs Sh. Naresh Kumar And Ors on 18 September, 1996

In the case in hand learned counsel for the plaintiff has contended that Shri R.K. Jain is duly authorised Suit No.280/09 20of 36 to file the suit, he being one of the directors of the company and in support of his submissions he has invited attention of the court to the provisions contained in Order 29 rule 1 of the CPC and also decision in United Bank of India vs. Naresh Kumar and Others (supra).

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 697 - B N Kirpal - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results