Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.38 seconds)
Dr. Rohitasw Yadav vs State Of Haryana And Others on 23 May, 2012 cites

Union Of India vs B.M. Jha on 24 October, 2007

Dealing with the judgments, which have been referred to by the counsel for the respondents first, the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India Vs. B.M.Jha (supra) was where specific statutory rules disentitled an employee for grant of arrears in case he has not worked on a particular post. It is on that basis the claim of the arrears was denied to the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 87 - Full Document

Narender Singh vs Union Of India And Others on 31 August, 2010

The judgment of the learned Single Judge in the case of Narender Singh (supra) is contrary to the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ram Pal (supra) as also in the case of Karnail Singh (supra) wherein this Court had while considering the C.W.P. No.11157 OF 2011 -3- case of similar nature has held that where the employee is deprived of and is not allowed promotion on account of non-application of the sealed cover procedure because of the departmental proceedings pending against him that cannot be a reason for denial of monetary benefit to the higher post to which promotion was granted to him by way of deemed date of promotion.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - K S Ahluwalia - Full Document
1