Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.24 seconds)Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
Section 3 in The Societies Registration Act, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Societies Registration Act, 1860 [Entire Act]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Assam & Ors vs Shri Kanak Chandra Dutta on 3 October, 1966
Therefore, the indicia laid
down in State of Assam v. Kanak Chandra Dutta (supra)
and State of Gujarat v. Raman Lal Keshav Lal (supra)
cannot be the only tests for determining whether a
person is holder of a civil post under the Union or the
State. In the case of a regular Government servant there
is undoubtedly a relationship of master and servant but
on account of constitutional provisions like Articles 16,
309 and 311 his position is quite different from a private
employee.
The Companies Act, 1956
The Bombay University Act, 1974
S. L. Agarwal vs General Manager, Hindustan Steel Ltd on 19 December, 1969
In this connection, it will be profitable to refer
to a decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court
in S.L Agarwal (Dr.) v. G.M, Hindustan Steel Ltd.
(Hindustan Steel Ltd. I) (1970) 1 SCC 177. In that case,
16 of 20
::: Downloaded on - 31-08-2019 23:40:17 :::
CWP-19790-2019 17
A was appointed as Assistant Surgeon by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation for one year. After
completion of the probation period, he was employed on
contract basis and his services were terminated in
accordance with the terms of the contract. He filed a
writ petition in the High Court contending that his
services were wrongly terminated which was violative
of Article 311 of the Constitution. The Corporation
contended that Article 311 was not applicable to him as
he was employed by the Corporation and he neither
belonged to civil service of the Union nor held a civil
post under the Union.