Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.24 seconds)

State Of Assam & Ors vs Shri Kanak Chandra Dutta on 3 October, 1966

Therefore, the indicia laid down in State of Assam v. Kanak Chandra Dutta (supra) and State of Gujarat v. Raman Lal Keshav Lal (supra) cannot be the only tests for determining whether a person is holder of a civil post under the Union or the State. In the case of a regular Government servant there is undoubtedly a relationship of master and servant but on account of constitutional provisions like Articles 16, 309 and 311 his position is quite different from a private employee.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 216 - R S Bachawat - Full Document

S. L. Agarwal vs General Manager, Hindustan Steel Ltd on 19 December, 1969

In this connection, it will be profitable to refer to a decision of the Constitution Bench of this Court in S.L Agarwal (Dr.) v. G.M, Hindustan Steel Ltd. (Hindustan Steel Ltd. I) (1970) 1 SCC 177. In that case, 16 of 20 ::: Downloaded on - 31-08-2019 23:40:17 ::: CWP-19790-2019 17 A was appointed as Assistant Surgeon by the Board of Directors of the Corporation for one year. After completion of the probation period, he was employed on contract basis and his services were terminated in accordance with the terms of the contract. He filed a writ petition in the High Court contending that his services were wrongly terminated which was violative of Article 311 of the Constitution. The Corporation contended that Article 311 was not applicable to him as he was employed by the Corporation and he neither belonged to civil service of the Union nor held a civil post under the Union.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 109 - M Hidayatullah - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next