Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)The Companies Act, 1956
The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995
Section 102 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Anil Rishi vs Gurbaksh Singh on 2 May, 2006
17. Hon'ble Apex Court in Anil Rishi Vs. Gurbaksh Singh - AIR 2006 SC
1971 has propounded that onus to prove a fact is on the person who
asserts it. Under Section 102 of The Indian Evidence Act, initial onus is
always on the plaintiff to prove his case and if he discharges, the onus
shifts to defendant.
M. Krishnan vs Vijay Singh And Anr on 11 October, 2001
Though unlike a criminal case, in civil cases there is no mandate for
proving fact beyond reasonable doubt, but even preponderance of
probabilities may serve as a good basis of decision, as was
propounded in M Krishnan Vs Vijay Singh- 2001 CrLJ 4705.
Section 14A in The Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
M..C. Chacko vs State Bank Of Travancore, Trivandrum on 23 July, 1969
22. Hon'ble Apex Court by its decision in M.C Chacko vs. State of
Travancore AIR 1970 SC 500, has propounded the Doctrine of Privity
of contract, as below "a person not a party to a contract cannot,
subject to certain well recognized exceptions, enforce the terms of
contract". Hence, the very saying of the Respondent that he entered
in an agreement with competitive MSO, and then after his
responsibility was finished, is not provided under the law.
1