Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.18 seconds)

Goa Plast (P) Ltd vs Chico Ursula D'Souza on 20 November, 2003

The facts of the above case will not be applicable to the facts of the case on hand and because the cheque drawn in the above said case was for an unenforceble debt on the date of drawal of the cheque, whereas in the case on hand even the complainant's own document Ex.P.19 glares at us that on the date of drawl of Ex.P.1-cheque Rs.2,00,489/- was due to the complainant only for the amount of future debt dated 21.5.1997, Ex.P.1-cheque was drawn on 13.12.1996. So I am not at all convinced by the submissions made by the learned senior counsel in this regard. I do not find any perverse attitude in the judgment of the trial Court to warrant any interference from this Court. Point is answered accordingly.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 321 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document
1   2 Next