Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)
Sube Singh Bahmani And Ors vs State Of Haryana on 16 September, 1999 cites

Gian Singhsaudagar Singh & Ors vs Gulab Singh & Ors.State Of Haryana on 8 July, 1997

Now that the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP(C) 23107/96 in Gian Singh's case ( to which Sadhu Singh and B.L. Grover are parties) is disposed of after re-fixing seniority at level of Deputy Superintendent and by directing a review of the promotions made to the post of Superintendent and Under Secretary, as per Ajit Singh NO.2, there can be no difficulty in the way of the State. We do not also think that any contempt has been committed when the promotion orders were passed on 19.2.97 for that was done bona fide in implementation of the order of this Court dated 4.12.96. The C.P.133/97 and the IA.3/97 are disposed of accordingly.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Sikander Pal Jain vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 19 July, 1984

There is one important aspect of the case which deserves notice. It is the claim of the sole appellant, Sube Singh Bahmani that he has been promoted as Dy.Superintendent(see p.192) on 15.5.86 subject to the result of Chander Pal vs. State of Haryana since disposed of by judgment reported in [1997 (10) SCC 474]. He contends that he has also been promoted as Superintendent on 6.1.88 and that respondents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 have been promoted as Deputy Superintendents on 16.11.88, 20.9.89, 11.8.92, 8.11.95 and 8.12.95, much after his further promotion as Superintendent on 6.1.1988 and that the other respondents have not even reached the level of Deputy Superintendents by that date.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 48 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document
1