Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Section 16 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath And Others vs The State on 28 July, 1961
21.There is vast variation in respect of milk fat and milk solids not fat
contents in respect of counterpart of the same sample by two Analysts.
One Analyst found milk fat 4.2% while another Analyst found milk
fat 1.1% in the counterpart of the same sample. PW-2 F.I. V.P.S.
Chaudhary confirmed in his cross-examination that chemistry is an
exact science and even if repeated test are performed on a sample
there will not be much difference between reports of two Analysts.
No explanation has come on record in respect of vast variation
between two reports in respect of counterpart of the same sample.
Thereby relying upon Kanshi Nath versus State (supra), I am of the
considered view that the sample was not representative.
Section 251 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State vs Anil Batra And Ors. on 2 April, 2008
In State v. Anil Batra and others 2008(I) FAC 191 (Del), it was
observed as follows:
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
1