Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.18 seconds)Section 263 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sunil Lamba vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 7 May, 2003
3. Sunil Lamha v. Dy. CIT (2004) 83 TTJ (Del) 174 : (2003) 131 Taxman 35 (Del).
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Gabrial India Ltd. on 10 February, 2005
In support of this plea, the learned counsel for the assessee has relied upon the order of the Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) and Rayon Silk Mills v. CIT and C7T v. Smt. D. Valliawwal .
Jhulelal Land Development Corpn. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 13 September, 1995
1. Jhulelal Land Development Corpn. v. Dy. CIT (1996) 56 ITD 345 (Mumbai)
Shital Trading And Investment Co. (P.) ... vs Income-Tax Officer on 28 December, 1992
3. Shital Trading & Investment Co. (P) Ltd. v. ITO (1993) 45 ITD 399 (Mumbai)
M/S.Madras Silk & Rayon Mills vs The Income Tax Officer / The ... on 11 February, 2002
In support of this plea, the learned counsel for the assessee has relied upon the order of the Gabriel India Ltd. (supra) and Rayon Silk Mills v. CIT and C7T v. Smt. D. Valliawwal .
C.T. Shenthilnathan Chettiar vs Raja D.V. Appa Rao Bahadur on 25 March, 1999
7. The learned Departmental Representative on the other hand has placed reliance upon the order of the CIT and also invited our attention to the fact that the assessee did not file complete details before the AO, as such, the CIT was justified in setting aside his order.