Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)State Of Kerala vs P.V.Krishnan on 27 March, 2007
applicable to the present case for two reasons. He submits that
firstly the present case is one where the petitioner was not
merely acquitted of the charges levelled against him, but it is a
case where the proceedings against him in the criminal court
were quashed by the Supreme Court. He referred to the
judgment of the Supreme Court in State through CBI v.
B.L.Verma {1997(10) SCC 772} and followed by a learned
Judge of this court in State of Kerala v. Krishnan P.V and
others {2007(2) ILR Kerala 389} in support of his
submissions.
Section 19 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Travancore Devaswom Board vs Rajasekharan Nair on 26 May, 2003
(7) Vikraman Pillai v. State of Kerala
{2003(2) KLT 397}
(8) Travancore Devaswom Board v. Rajasekharan
W.P.(C).NO.2080/06
:: 20 ::
Smt. K. Ponnamma vs The State Of Kerala & Ors on 17 March, 1997
(1) Ponnamma v. State of Kerala {1997 (1)
KLT 720 (SC)},
(2) Ramachandran v. Director of Health Services
{2002 (2) KLT SN 121 Case No.148}.
The Managing Director, Kerala State ... vs P. Nanu, Smt. Kamalam S. Pillai, W/O. ... on 7 August, 2002
(3) Mohammed Easa Sahib v. DIG of Police
{1990(2) KLT 462}
(4) Appukuttan Pillai v. State of Kerala
{2001(2) KLT SN page 40, Case No.45}
(5) Kerala State Bandloom Development Corporation
Ltd. v. Nanu {2002(3) ILR Kerala 270}.
N. Appukuttan Pillai And Anr. vs State Of Kerala on 18 November, 1998
(3) Mohammed Easa Sahib v. DIG of Police
{1990(2) KLT 462}
(4) Appukuttan Pillai v. State of Kerala
{2001(2) KLT SN page 40, Case No.45}
(5) Kerala State Bandloom Development Corporation
Ltd. v. Nanu {2002(3) ILR Kerala 270}.
Vikraman Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 1 February, 2006
(7) Vikraman Pillai v. State of Kerala
{2003(2) KLT 397}
(8) Travancore Devaswom Board v. Rajasekharan
W.P.(C).NO.2080/06
:: 20 ::
1