Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)Section 354 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 509 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Karan Singh & Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 September, 2003
31.Identical has been the view expressed by the Madhya Pradesh High
36
Court in Karan Singh & Ors. Vs. State of MP 1992. In the cited case
there were rival claims on the fishing rights in the tank. The
complainant party accosted by the accused persons had divulged
their identity. The accused persons called them by the name of their
tribes.
Section 25 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Goura Gobinda Das And Kamala Kanta Padhi vs State Of Orissa on 18 November, 1999
30.It is well known that the above said Act has been enforced to
provide stringent punishment because it agitates the atrocities being
caused on people belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled
Tribes. It is an enactment to weed out atrocities being inflicted on
the mind and body of a particular set of persons. The Orissa High
Court in Criminal Appeal no. 70 and 84 of 1994 decided on 18 th
November, 1999 in the case of Gobinda Das Vs State of Orissa
reiterated the same view point. It was held that to attract the
provision of section 3 it is necessary that it should be in a place
where public could view the incident but with some care and caution
was suggested. It was held that trial court should exercise with
great care and caution because chances of false implications cannot
be ruled out.
1