Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 155 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo on 7 December, 2005
( See State of Orissa v. Saroj Kumar
Sahoo (2005) 13 SCC 540 and Minu Kumari v. State of Bihar
AIR 2006 SC 1937)
Section 156 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Netai Dutta vs State Of West Bengal on 28 February, 2005
In Netai Dutta's case
(supra) para 6 it was observed as follows:
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960
In R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866 this
Court summarized some categories of cases where inherent
power can and should be exercised to quash the proceedings.
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
10. As noted above, the powers possessed by the High Court
under Section 482 of the Code. are very wide and the very
plenitude of the power requires great caution in its exercise.
Court must be careful to see that its decision in exercise of
this power is based on sound principles. The inherent power
should not be exercised to stifle a legitimate prosecution. The
High Court being the highest court of a State should normally
refrain from giving a prima facie decision in a case where the
entire facts are incomplete and hazy, more so when the
evidence has not been collected and produced before the Court
and the issues involved, whether factual or legal, are of
magnitude and cannot be seen in their true perspective
without sufficient material. Of course, no hard and fast rule
can be laid down in regard to cases in which the High Court
will exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction of quashing the
proceeding at any stage.
1