Vithaldas Cursondas vs Dulsukhbhai Vadilal on 22 February, 1919
The Division Bench, therefore, approved the
following passage in Vithal Das Cursondas (supra) viz.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.90 seconds)Dinar Rashid Wadia And Anr. vs Kersy Eruch Lalkala And Ors. on 10 February, 2004
So far as the judgment in the case of Dinar Rashid
Wadia 2 (supra) is concerned, the learned Single Judge was
pleased to make observations in the said judgment in the
light of the facts of the said case and the question which the
Court was asked to answer was about the existence or non-
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi vs The State Of Bombay And Others.(And ... on 18 March, 1954
Bakhtawar Lentin & Ors5. He then relied upon the
1 (1919) XXI BLR 972
2 (1908) XXXIII ILR (Bombay) 509
3 [1965] 1 ALL ER 609
4 1993 (1) Bom.C.R. 267
5 2007(1) Bom.C.R. 915
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:40:41 :::
19
judgments in Ratilal Panchand Gandhi and others v. State of
Bombay and others1 and in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin
Saheb v. State of Bombay 2 reported in AIR 1962 page 90 and
finally he relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court Sri
Sinha Ramanuja Jeer alias Sri Vanamalai Ramanuja Jeer
Swamigal v. Sri Ranga Ramanuja Jeer alias Emberumanar
Jeer and others3
Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb vs The State Of Bombay on 9 January, 1962
Bakhtawar Lentin & Ors5. He then relied upon the
1 (1919) XXI BLR 972
2 (1908) XXXIII ILR (Bombay) 509
3 [1965] 1 ALL ER 609
4 1993 (1) Bom.C.R. 267
5 2007(1) Bom.C.R. 915
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:40:41 :::
19
judgments in Ratilal Panchand Gandhi and others v. State of
Bombay and others1 and in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin
Saheb v. State of Bombay 2 reported in AIR 1962 page 90 and
finally he relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court Sri
Sinha Ramanuja Jeer alias Sri Vanamalai Ramanuja Jeer
Swamigal v. Sri Ranga Ramanuja Jeer alias Emberumanar
Jeer and others3
Sri Sinna Ramanuja Jeer And Others vs Sri Ranga Ramanuja Jeer And Another on 27 April, 1961
Bakhtawar Lentin & Ors5. He then relied upon the
1 (1919) XXI BLR 972
2 (1908) XXXIII ILR (Bombay) 509
3 [1965] 1 ALL ER 609
4 1993 (1) Bom.C.R. 267
5 2007(1) Bom.C.R. 915
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:40:41 :::
19
judgments in Ratilal Panchand Gandhi and others v. State of
Bombay and others1 and in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin
Saheb v. State of Bombay 2 reported in AIR 1962 page 90 and
finally he relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court Sri
Sinha Ramanuja Jeer alias Sri Vanamalai Ramanuja Jeer
Swamigal v. Sri Ranga Ramanuja Jeer alias Emberumanar
Jeer and others3
Mrs. Lyla Darius Jehangir (Nee ... vs Bakhtawar Lentin Of Mumbai And Ors. ... on 12 December, 2006
In the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in Lyla Darius
Jehangir v. Bankhtawar Lentin & Ors.1, though the Division
Bench has noticed the observations made by Pratt J. in
Vithal Das Cursondas (supra), it has also considered the
observations made by the learned Single Judge in Rama Aziz
Parpia (supra) and in para 11, the Division Bench has
1 2007(1) Bom.C.R.915
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:40:42 :::
33
observed that the proceedings highlighted by the learned
Single Judges of this Court in the case of Vidhtaldas
Cursondas and Rama Aziz Parpia (supra) appear to us to be
sound.
Mazda Theatres Limited vs Gordhandas Tribhuvandas Mangaldas on 4 August, 1954
1 AIR 2004 BOMBAY 159
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:40:42 :::
35
There cannot be any dispute regarding the ratio of the
judgment in the case of Mazda Theatres Limited (supra).
The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950
1