Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 58 (3.86 seconds)Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 26 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 25 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Commissions Of Inquiry Act, 1952
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
State Of Maharashtra vs Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak & Anr on 28 July, 1982
"10. It would be logical to first deal with the
plea relating to absence of forum of appeal.
It is to be noted that the parties agreed
before the High Court that instead of remanding
the matter to trial Court, it should consider
materials on record and render a verdict.
After having done so, it is not open to the
appellant to turn round or take a plea that no
concession was given. This is clearly a case
of sitting on the fence, and is not to be
encouraged. If really there was no concession,
the only course open to the appellant was to
move the High Court in line with what has been
said in State of Maharashtra v. Ramdas
Shrinivas Nayak & Anr. (1982(2) SCC 463).
Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj vs The State Of Rajasthan And Others on 21 January, 1963
[See Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj Vs. State of Rajasthan
[1963] 1 SCR 561 and Pannalal Pitti Vs. State of A.P. (1996) 2 SCC
498].