Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.21 seconds)
Sujatha D/O Thippanna vs H.Kumarswamy S/O Hanumanthappa on 22 September, 2023 cites

Mukund Dewangan vs Oriental Ins.Co.Ltd on 11 February, 2016

4. In the present case the offending vehicle is passenger carrying auto rickshaw. Thus, it is a light motor vehicle (transport). But the driver was holding driving -5- NC: 2023:KHC-D:11114 MFA No. 101945 of 2015 C/W MFA No. 101944 of 2015, MFA No. 101946 of 2015 licence to drive the light motor vehicle (non transport). Therefore there is no endorsement (transport) in the said LMV licence. The question involved is no more res-integra in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited, (2017) 14 Supreme Court Cases 663, wherein it is held that a person who is holding driving licence to drive LMV (non transport) can also drive LMV (transport). Therefore this is not a fundamental breach so as to absolve the insurance company to pay compensation. Therefore, the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 2801 - A Mishra - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022

14. As per the age group mentioned in National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others, reported in (2017) 16 Supreme Court Cases 680, and as per the Division Bench judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Company Vs. Abdul S/o Mehaboob Tahasildar in MFA No.103807/2016 C/w. MFA Nos.103835/2016 & 103807/2018 and as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sidram vs. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited and another reported in (2023) 3 SCC 439, even in the case of injuries, certain
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1946 - J R Dua - Full Document

New India Assurance Company Limited vs Abdul S/O Mehaboob Tahasildar on 27 May, 2022

14. As per the age group mentioned in National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others, reported in (2017) 16 Supreme Court Cases 680, and as per the Division Bench judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Company Vs. Abdul S/o Mehaboob Tahasildar in MFA No.103807/2016 C/w. MFA Nos.103835/2016 & 103807/2018 and as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sidram vs. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited and another reported in (2023) 3 SCC 439, even in the case of injuries, certain
Karnataka High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 14 - K S Dixit - Full Document

Sidram vs The Divisional Manager United India ... on 16 November, 2022

14. As per the age group mentioned in National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others, reported in (2017) 16 Supreme Court Cases 680, and as per the Division Bench judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Company Vs. Abdul S/o Mehaboob Tahasildar in MFA No.103807/2016 C/w. MFA Nos.103835/2016 & 103807/2018 and as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sidram vs. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited and another reported in (2023) 3 SCC 439, even in the case of injuries, certain
Supreme Court of India Cites 50 - Cited by 44 - S Kant - Full Document
1