Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.35 seconds)Uttranchal Forest Development ... vs M.C. Joshi on 23 February, 2007
In Uttaranchal Forest
Development Corporation Vs. M.C. Joshi [(2007)9 SCC
Page 11 of 19
C/SCA/9140/2013 CAV JUDGMENT
353], the Supreme Court inter alia stated that on the
question of grant of compensation instead of
reinstatement, one of the relevant factor was whether
appointment in question was made in terms of statutory
rules.
Sita Ram & Ors vs Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training ... on 5 March, 2008
In Sita Ram and others Vs Motilal Nehru
Farmers Training Institute [(2008)5 SCC 75], the
workman was a daily-wager and was found to have worked
intermittently for seven years upto his retrenchment
which was before several years. In such circumstances,
it was held that the High Court's order directing
reinstatement was not proper and instead, compensation
of Rs.01,00,000/- was awarded, holding that it would
meet the ends of justice.
Mahboob Deepak vs Nagar Panchayat Gajraula & Anr on 13 December, 2007
7.2 In Mahboob Deepak Vs. Nagar Panchayat,
Gajraula [(2008) 1 SCC 575], the appellant who was a
daily-wager, who worked for one year and found to have
completed 240 days of service and his serviced were
terminated on the ground of financial irregularities
was awarded Rs.50,000/- as lumpsum compensation in
lieu of reinstatement.
Municipal Corporation, Faridabad vs Siri Niwas on 6 September, 2004
In
this regard, it would be pertinent to mention
the observation of three-Judge Bench of this
court in the case of Municipal Corporation,
Faridabad v. Siri Niwas [(2004) 8 SCC 195]:
U.P. State Brassware Corpn. Ltd. & Anr vs Udai Narain Pandey on 8 December, 2005
(See U.P. State Brassware Corpn.
Ltd. v. Uday Narain Pandey [2006 (1) SCC 479],
Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn. v. M.C.
Joshi [2007 (9) SCC 353], State of M.P. v.
Lalit Kumar Verma [2007 (1) SCC 575], M.P.
Page 9 of 19
C/SCA/9140/2013 CAV JUDGMENT
Admn.
State Of M.P. & Ors vs Lalit Kumar Verma on 24 November, 2006
(See U.P. State Brassware Corpn.
Ltd. v. Uday Narain Pandey [2006 (1) SCC 479],
Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn. v. M.C.
Joshi [2007 (9) SCC 353], State of M.P. v.
Lalit Kumar Verma [2007 (1) SCC 575], M.P.
Page 9 of 19
C/SCA/9140/2013 CAV JUDGMENT
Admn.
Asst.Engineer,Rajasthan Dev.Corp.& ... vs Gitam Singh on 31 January, 2013
The Court in Gitam Singh (supra)
held as under:
Ghaziabad Development Authority & Anr vs Ashok Kumar & Anr on 15 February, 2008
In Ghaziabad Development
Authority (supra), the workman was awarded
Rs.50,000/- as lumpsum compensation.
B.S.N.L vs Bhurumal on 11 December, 2013
facts of the particular case. For instance, in
Bhurumal (supra), the Supreme Court noticed that
post which the workman held was of Lineman in the
Telephone Department, and that the work of
Lineman was drastically reduced in view of
advancement of the technology.