Lowenbrau Ag & Another vs Jagpin Breweries Ltd & Another on 14 January, 2009
[Lowenbrau AG and Anr. v. Jagpin Breweries Ltd
and Anr. MIPR 2009 (1) 356].
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.29 seconds)Marico Limited vs Agro Tech Foods Limited on 1 November, 2010
34. It is also relevant to refer the judgment of the Delhi
High Court in Marico Industries vs. Agro Tech Foods Ltd.
[2010 (43) PTC 39]
48/60
http://www.judis.nic.in
O.A.Nos.1113, 1114 of 2018 in C.S.No.802 of 2018;
Mrs. Ishi Khosla vs Anil Aggarwal And Anr. on 25 January, 2007
5.Ishi Khosla Vs. Anil Agareal & Anr. [ 2007 (34)
PTC 370 (Del)]
Info Edge (India) Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. vs Shailesh Gupta And Anr. on 5 March, 2002
6.mInfo Edge (India)Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shailesh Gupta &
Anr. [ ILR 2002 (I) DEL 220 ]
7· Info Edge (India) Ltd. Vs. Sumanta Bhattacharya
[ (2017) 240 DLT 737 ]
8· Regina Vs. Hogan [ 1974 All ER 142 ]
9· Inovation Ventures, LLc Vs. N.V.E., Inc No.10-
2353 ( 6th Cir.2012) [763 F. 3d 524]
Stokely Van Camp, Inc. And Another vs Heinz India Private Limited on 31 May, 2010
Consim Info Pvt. Ltd vs Google India Pvt. Ltd on 30 September, 2010
23. The learned Single Judge of this Court after elaborate
discussion, has not granted injunction. The above judgment has been
reported in CONSIM INFO PVT LTD Vs. GOOGLE INDIA PVT LTD &
FOUR OTHERS [2010 (6) CTC 813]. The same issue raised in the
earlier litigation is also almost similar in the instant cases. In
paragraph No.146, the learned Single Judge, at paragraph 146 has
observed and held that the words “Tamil”, “Muslim”, etc., are
descriptive items, indicating a race, language, ethnic group or a
community and no one is entitled to monopolise the use of these
words. Similarly, the word 'matrimony' is descriptive of the state of
marriage of a person.
Lupin Ltd vs Johnson And Johnson on 23 December, 2014
In this regard, it is relevant to refer the judgment of the
Full Bench of Bombay High Court in Lupin Limited vs. Johnson
47/60
http://www.judis.nic.in
O.A.Nos.1113, 1114 of 2018 in C.S.No.802 of 2018;
Begum Sabiha Sultan vs Nawab Mohd. Mansur Ali Khan & Ors on 12 April, 2007
The pleadings in this
regard, as in every other case, has to be read
"meaningfully" (see Begum Sabiha Sultan v. Nawab
Mohd. Mansur Ali Khan and Ors.
Asian Paints Limited vs Home Solutions Retail (India) Limited on 17 September, 2007
(ii) Some marks are inherently incapable of
distinctiveness. [Asian Paints Ltd v. Home Solutions
Retail (India) Ltd. MANU/MH/0699/2007 : 2007
(35) PTC 697 (Bom)