Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (1.80 seconds)The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 2 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Manish Lal Shrivastava vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 1 December, 2020
In Manish Lal Shrivastava v State of Himachal Pradesh, CrMPM
No. 1734 of 2020, after analysing judicial precedents, this Court observed that any
Court granting bail with sureties should give a choice to the accused to either furnish
surety bonds or give a fixed deposit, with a further option to switch over to another.
Mohan Lal And Ors. Etc. vs Prem Chand And Ors. Etc. on 23 May, 1980
2. The Petitioner straightaway filed the bail petition before High Court,
which is permissible given the decision of a three Judges Bench of HP High Court, in
Mohan Lal v Prem Chand, AIR 1980 HP 36, (Para 9 & 15), wherein the Full bench
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
judgment?
Sumit Mehta vs State Of N.C.T. Of Delhi on 13 September, 2013
In
::: Downloaded on - 20/01/2021 20:59:46 :::HCHP
4
Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, (2013)15 SCC 570, Para 11, Supreme
Court holds that while exercising power Under Section 438 of the Code, the Court is
.
Sunny Kapoor @ Honey vs State Of H.P on 1 January, 2021
In Sunny Kapoor v State
of HP, CrMPM 2168 of 2020, (Para 15), this Court observed that when the quantity
is less than commercial, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act will not attract,
and factors become similar to bail petitions under regular statutes. Thus, when the
maximum sentence cannot exceed ten years, and the accused is yet to be proved
guilty, the grant of bail is normal, unless the Prosecution points towards the
exceptional circumstances, negating the bail.