Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)Amarjit Singh Ahluwalia vs The State Of Punjab & Ors on 20 December, 1974
2.Amarjit Singh Vs. State, reported as 1995 Jcc 91;
Abdul Ghaffar S/O Jahangir vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 21 August, 1993
4.Abdul Ghaffar Vs. State, reported as 1996 Jcc 497;
Prem Singh And Others vs Haryana State Electricity Board And ... on 7 May, 1996
5.Prem Singh Vs. State, reported as 1996 Jcc 519;
Nathiya And Anr. vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 January, 1991
8.Nathiya Vs. State, reported as 1992 (1) Crimes 537;
Safiullah vs State (Delhi Administration) on 9 November, 1992
1.Safiullah Vs. State, reported as 1993 Jcc 33;
Lachho Devi vs State on 27 July, 1990
10.Lachho Qeir Vs. State, reported as 1990 (2) Chandigarh Criminal Cases 395;
State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
The law in this behalf has also been spelt out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh (SC), reported as 1994 Jcc 303 and Mahinder Kumar Vs. State, Panaji, Goa, reported as 1995 Crl.L.J. 2074, which has been followed by me in the cases of Richard Thomas Wrigley Vs. Customs & Anr. (Crl.A.149/96) decided on March 20, 1997 and Mrs. Carmel Sanchez Gracia Vs. Customs, New Delhi (Grl.A.51/95) decided on April 21, 1997 wherein it has been held that the provisions of Section 57 Ndps are mandatory and non-compliance thereof would vitiate the trial. There is no evidence on record to prove that the requirements of Section 57 Ndps Act were met. For this reason also, the trial of the appellant stands vitiated on account of failure of evidence in this connection. I give benefit of doubt to the appellant
Accordingly, allow appeal and acquit the appellant. The appellant be released forthwith unless and until required any other case
THIS appeal and the application are disposed of to the above terms. Dasti.
Carmel Sanchez Gracia vs Customs, New Delhi on 21 April, 1997
The law in this behalf has also been spelt out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh (SC), reported as 1994 Jcc 303 and Mahinder Kumar Vs. State, Panaji, Goa, reported as 1995 Crl.L.J. 2074, which has been followed by me in the cases of Richard Thomas Wrigley Vs. Customs & Anr. (Crl.A.149/96) decided on March 20, 1997 and Mrs. Carmel Sanchez Gracia Vs. Customs, New Delhi (Grl.A.51/95) decided on April 21, 1997 wherein it has been held that the provisions of Section 57 Ndps are mandatory and non-compliance thereof would vitiate the trial. There is no evidence on record to prove that the requirements of Section 57 Ndps Act were met. For this reason also, the trial of the appellant stands vitiated on account of failure of evidence in this connection. I give benefit of doubt to the appellant
Accordingly, allow appeal and acquit the appellant. The appellant be released forthwith unless and until required any other case
THIS appeal and the application are disposed of to the above terms. Dasti.
Pradeep Kumar, Krishan Kant And Jagdish vs State Of U.P. on 14 February, 1992
9.Pradeep Kr. Vs. State, reported as 1990 Chandigarh Criminal Cases 69;