Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)Article 92 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Punjab Tenancy Rules
Jagardeo Singh vs Phuljhari And Anr. on 14 May, 1908
2. The deed of relinquishment was dated 19th January 1918, and the suit was filed on the 24th June 1923. Therefore, if Art, 92 was properly applicable and governed the whole of the reliefs asked for, the suit was properly dismissed. The plaintiff, who was a pardanashin lady, does not appear to have wholly slept upon her rights, but she or her advisers, did not know how to proceed and they wasted some considerable time in making applications to the District Judge and the Collector. It was urged below that she was entitled to the benefit of the time occupied in these proceedings. But that contention has not been repeated before us, and it is clear that if Article 92 governs the whole of the relief which she sought, the suit was barred. On behalf of the appellant we have been referred to the case of Jagardeo Singh v. Phuljhari [1908] 30 All.
1