Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.15 seconds)Section 59 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Dinesh Chandra Guha vs Satchidananda Mukherji And Ors. on 4 January, 1972
This Nagpur decision has also been followed by this Court in Dinesh Chandra v. Satchidananda Mukherji, AIR 1972 Ori 235 and it has been held that endorsement as to payment of money made in presence of the Sub-Registrar gives rise to initial presumption as to payment of consideration of the document.
Gulam Ali Saha And Ors. vs Sultan Khan And Anr. on 28 February, 1966
Of the two executants, Ujal is already dead. This fact is not disputjed. From the contents of Ext. B, it appears that Ujal admitted receipt of consideration. This admission by Ujal is admissible under Section 32(3) of the Evidence Act. This principle has been clearly laid down by this Court in Gulam Ali Sana v. Sultan Khan, ILR (1966) Cut 571 : (AIR 1967 Ori 55) and Lakshmidhar Sahu v. Kanhei Sahu, 1973 (2) Cut WR 1759. The admission made by Ujal in the document about receipt of the consideration money is also a good piece of evidence in support of passing of consideration.
1