Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.09 seconds)

Super Spinning Mills Ltd., Coimbatore vs Acit, Coimbatore on 18 January, 2017

As per the provisions of Income Tax Act section 6 ITA No.94/Viz/2017 JOCIL Ltd. Guntur 80IA, the assesse is entitled to claim the deduction in any 10 consecutive years out of 15 years, beginning from the year in which the undertaking commenced its eligible business at the option of the assessee. Therefore the set off losses would commence from the year in which the assesse first opt to claim the deduction and outer limit is 15 years. Therefore the losses incurred prior to the initial year cannot be set off against the income of initial and the subsequent assessment years. The Hon'ble Madras High Court's decision in the case of Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills(P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra) is directly on the issue and in favour of the assessee.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 3 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

Vivimed Labs Ltd., (Formerly Known As ... vs Acit, Circle-3(3), Hyd, Hyderabad on 3 February, 2017

Hon'ble Coordinate Bench's decision in the case of M/s Hyderabad Chemicals Supplies Ltd. Vs. ACIT (supra) is in favour of the revenue and the decision of this Tribunal in Devi Seafoods Ltd. Vs. JCIT (supra) is also in favour of the assessee. The assessing officer has considered this issue and allowed the deduction. When there are two views expressed by the courts, if the decision taken by the assessing officer is in consonance with the one of the views the same cannot be held to be erroneous.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 5 - Cited by 27 - Full Document

Cit vs Max India Ltd. on 1 November, 2007

This view is supported by Honourable Supreme Court judgement in the case of CIT Vs. Max India Ltd. [295 ITR 0282]. Further, when there is a 7 ITA No.94/Viz/2017 JOCIL Ltd. Guntur conflict between the orders of the Tribunal and the High Courts, the order of the Hon'ble High Court is having more persuasive value and the order of the jurisdictional tribunal order is binding on the lower authorities.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 786 - Full Document
1