Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)

Sri Nadella Venkata Nageswara Rao,, ... vs The Dcit,, Vijayawada on 20 December, 2017

8. On a perusal of the above, we find that the Hon'ble High Court after considering the judgment in Potla Nageswara Rao (supra), has held that unless consideration is received or accrues to the assessee, or unless possession is handed over in the manner contemplated under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, no transfer can be said to have occurred for the purpose of section 45 of the Act. In the present case, the revenue has not brought on record any material to show that the assessee received any consideration, monetary or otherwise, during the year of execution of JDA; or the assessee handed over possession to the developer otherwise than for the limited purpose of development. In absence of such essential conditions, the very foundation of invoking section 45(1) of the Act in the year of JDA fails.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Panji Cites 6 - Cited by 17 - Full Document
1