Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)
P E Meerza Waheed vs The Secretary Department Of Personnel ... on 3 December, 2019 cites

A.V.Thiyagarajan vs The Secretary To Government on 27 November, 2012

Annexure A4 - True copy of the order in SLP Diary No. 22283/2018. Annexure A5 - True copy of the representation dt. 20.10.2018. Annexure A6 - True copy of the unstarred question No. 427 and answer dt. 12.12.2018 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions - Lok Sabha. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES Annexure R1 - True copy of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in A.V. Thiyagarajan v. The Secretary to Government(WP No. 20732/2012) dated 27.11.2012.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 39 - K Chandru - Full Document

The Secretary Ministry Of Finance, ... vs Prabhakar Match Industries, ... on 19 September, 1988

7. The petitioner herein had completed one full year service as on 30.06.2013, but the increment fell due on 01.07.2013, on which date he was not in service. In view of the above judgment of this Court, naturally he has to be treated as having completed one full year of service, though the date of increment falls on the next day of his retirement. Applying the said judgment to the present case, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order passed by the first respondent-Tribunal dated 21.03.2017 is quashed. The petitioner shall be given one notional increment for the period from 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2013, as he has completed one full year of service, though his increment fell on 01.07.2013, for the purpose of pensionary benefits and not for any other purpose. No costs."
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 61 - Full Document
1