Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.32 seconds)Article 65 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 17 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Court-fees Act, 1870
Section 7 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Amrit Kaur vs Sarabjeet Singh & Ors on 29 August, 2008
24. On other hand, Ld. Counsel for defendants has argued that Smt.
Karmawali expired on 28.08.1972. Thus, the limitation for seeking
partition of the suit property commenced on the said date. The
limitation for filing a suit for partition is 12 years from the date of cause
of action. But, the plaintiff has filed the present suit on 29.04.2022 i.e.
after almost 50 years of death of her mother. It has been so held in the
case of Amrit Kaur (supra) that Article 110 of the Schedule to the Act
[the Limitation Act] provides that a suit by a person excluded from a
joint family property, to enforce a right to share therein is twelve years.
Saroj Salkan vs Capt. Sanjeev Singh & Others on 28 November, 2008
2026.03.16
15:09:32 +0530
down in the cases of Saroj Salkan (supra) and Anita Anand (supra) in
this regard.
P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy & Ors vs Revamma And Ors on 24 April, 2007
29. Firstly, the Court stands guided by the precedent laid down by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy v. Revamma,
AIR 2007 SC 1753, wherein the Court has discussed the aspect of
adverse possession. The excerpts of observations of the Court are that:
Article 110 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
S. M. Karim vs Mst. Bibi Sakina on 14 February, 1964
2026.03.16
15:09:22 +0530
been disclosed. An observation has been made in this regard in
S.M. Karim v. Mst. Bibi Sakina [AIR 1964 SC 1254] :