Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.23 seconds)
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Khurana vs Mr. Virender Kumar Malhotra on 13 March, 2014 cites

Mohan Lal Goela vs Siri Krishan on 8 August, 1977

"The law has been correctly noticed and followed by the learned Tribunal. I agree with its findings that in the present case the petition for eviction was maintainable without implicating Smt. Sham Kaur who is co-owner of the property. I may notice that in Mohan Lal Goela v. Shri Sri Krishan & Ors. MANU/DE/0028/1978 : AIR 1978 Delhi 92 , it was observed by Avadh Behari.J. that a co-owner was as much an owner of the property as any sole owner."
Delhi High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 26 - Full Document

Kanta Goel vs B.P. Pathak & Ors on 1 April, 1977

The Supreme Court in Smt. Kanta Gael v. B. P. Pathak and others, [1977] 3 SCR 412 , after referring to its earlier decision in Shri Ram Pasricha [1977] 1 SCR 395 , that a co-owner is as much an owner of the entire property as any sole owner of the property is, held that where a co-owner functioned for all practical purposes as the landlord he was entitled to institute proceedings of eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act against the tenant. (11) In the instant case, as already stated, it has been found that Raj Math Sharma was managing the property on behalf of all the co- owners which includes the guardian of the minor, and it cannot be said that he could not terminate the tenancy and take proceedings for the eviction of the tenant."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 301 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1   2 Next