Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.18 seconds)
Dibyendu Ghosh vs Saibal Kumar Acharyya & Ors on 14 November, 2022 cites

State Of U.P.& Ors vs Ravindra Kumar Sharma & Ors on 3 February, 2016

In this connection Learned counsel has relied on the following decisions: State of U.P. Vs. Ravindra Kumar Sharma reported in 2016(3) CHN (SC) 229, M.M. Thomas Vs. State of Kerala and Anr. reported in (2001) 1 Supreme Court Cases 666, Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi & Ors. reported in (2003) 8 Supreme Court Cases 319, Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Gandhi reported in (2012) 1 Supreme Court Cases 476.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 73 - A Mishra - Full Document

Ram Chandra Singh vs Savitri Devi And Ors on 9 October, 2003

In this connection Learned counsel has relied on the following decisions: State of U.P. Vs. Ravindra Kumar Sharma reported in 2016(3) CHN (SC) 229, M.M. Thomas Vs. State of Kerala and Anr. reported in (2001) 1 Supreme Court Cases 666, Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi & Ors. reported in (2003) 8 Supreme Court Cases 319, Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Gandhi reported in (2012) 1 Supreme Court Cases 476.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 485 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Ramesh Gandhi on 14 November, 2011

In this connection Learned counsel has relied on the following decisions: State of U.P. Vs. Ravindra Kumar Sharma reported in 2016(3) CHN (SC) 229, M.M. Thomas Vs. State of Kerala and Anr. reported in (2001) 1 Supreme Court Cases 666, Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi & Ors. reported in (2003) 8 Supreme Court Cases 319, Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Gandhi reported in (2012) 1 Supreme Court Cases 476.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 104 - Full Document

Vinod Kumar Singh vs Banaras Hindu University & Others on 11 November, 1987

However, in the present case, without recalling the earlier order, the Learned Judge went on to pass further directions in a disposed of writ petition. This could not have been done. The Supreme Court decision in Vinod Kumar Sing (supra) and the decision of a Special Bench of this Court in Mallikarujan Rao & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal reported in 2016 SCC OnLine Cal 3952 are authorities for the proposition that once a judge dictates a judgment and signs it, the Judge loses jurisdiction over the lis in question. Without restoring the matter on valid grounds following due process of law, no order can be passed in a matter which has been disposed of. This is also a ground on which we are inclined to allow the appeal and set aside the order dated 01.08.2022.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 75 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Mallikarjuna Rao & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal on 13 July, 2016

However, in the present case, without recalling the earlier order, the Learned Judge went on to pass further directions in a disposed of writ petition. This could not have been done. The Supreme Court decision in Vinod Kumar Sing (supra) and the decision of a Special Bench of this Court in Mallikarujan Rao & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal reported in 2016 SCC OnLine Cal 3952 are authorities for the proposition that once a judge dictates a judgment and signs it, the Judge loses jurisdiction over the lis in question. Without restoring the matter on valid grounds following due process of law, no order can be passed in a matter which has been disposed of. This is also a ground on which we are inclined to allow the appeal and set aside the order dated 01.08.2022.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 19 - Cited by 2 - A Bose - Full Document
1