Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.22 seconds)

Mohan Singh vs Prem Singh And Anr on 1 October, 2002

26. The above statements which is admissible in evidence against the accused in view of sub clause 4 of section 313 Cr.P.C. and the law laid down in Mohan Singh v. Prem Singh, (SC) 2002(4) R.C.R.(Criminal) 842, Rattan FIR No.140/09 State Vs. Santosh 11/12 Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (SC) 1997 A.I.R. (SC) 768, Sh. Mith kalitha V. State of Assam 2006 Cr.l.J. 2570, State of Rajasthan V. Ganesh Dass 1995 Cr.L.J. 25 (Raj.), Bishwas Prasad Sinha V. State of Assam 2007 (1) Crimes 147 (SC), Anthoney Disuja V State of Karnataka AIR 2003 SC 258, State of H.P. V. Wazir Chand AIR 1978 SC 315, proves the presence of the accused at the date, time and spot of incident. It also proves that he was arrested by the police at the instance of the complainant. However, his plea of having been falsely implicated does not inspire confidence. Reason is as already discussed above, I find no reasons why the complainant or the police officials would falsely implicate the accused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 198 - Full Document

Balbir Singh vs U.H.B.V.N Ltd. And Others ... on 12 August, 2010

21. The law is well settled that conviction can be based upon the sole testimony of the complainant/aggrieved witness if it inspires confidence. There is no rule of law that independent corroboration is required in all cases/circumstances. Reliance may be placed upon the law laid down in Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab, (P&H) 2003 Cri.L.J. 3148 and State of Gujarat v. Bharwad Jakshibhai Nagribhai, (Gujarat) (DB) 1990 Cri.L.J. 2531, Appabhai v. State of Gujarat AIR 1988 SC 696 and State of U.P. v. Anil Singh, AIR 1988 SC 1998.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 31 - P Kohli - Full Document
1   2 Next