Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.22 seconds)Section 37 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 3A in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. vs The Board Of Trustees Of V.O. ... on 28 July, 2021
32. As observed in above noted Judgment of Supreme Court i.e. PSA
and M.M.T.C., (Supra) the power of this Court to interfere with an arbitral
award is extremely limited. Unless the award suffers from patent illegality
or falls within the limited grounds contemplated under Section 34 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, interference would not be
warranted. The scope of interference becomes even narrower while
Page 21 of 23
Arb Appeal 103-2025, oth
exercising appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the said Act.
The National Highways Act, 1956
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Government vs The Century Spinning And Manufacturing ... on 16 October, 1941
In
Government v. The Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co.
Ltd. MANU/MH/0092/1941 : A.I.R.1942 Bom 105 wherein this
Court observed that when large proportion of frontage is
acquired and a relatively small amount of frontage is left with
the owner of the remaining land, he is entitled to some
compensation in respect of severance.
Kuldeep Singh vs The Commissioner Of Police & Ors on 17 December, 1998
In Kuldeep Singh v. Commr. of Police (1999) 2 SCC 10, it was held: