Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)

Inder Singh & Anr vs The State (Delhi Admn.) on 24 February, 1978

(See: Inder Singh and Anr. Vs. State of (Delhi Admn.) AIR 1978 S.C. 1091). Vague hunches cannot take place of judicial evaluation. " A judge does not preside over a criminal trial, merely see that no innocent man ins punished. Judge also presides to see that a guilty man does not escape. Both are his public duties." Per Viscount Simon in Stirland V/s. Director of Public Prosecution, 1994 AC (P.C.) 315 quoted in State of U.P. V/s. Anil Singh JT. 1988 (3) SC 491; A.I. R 1988 S.C. 1998 . Doubts would be called reasonable if they are free from am zest for abstract speculation. Law cannot afford any favourite other than truth".
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 214 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1