Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 35 (0.46 seconds)Section 31 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 31A in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 32P in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Improvement Trust, Ludhiana vs Ujagar Singh & Ors on 9 June, 2010
In the case of Improvement Trust, Ludhaina vs. Ujagar
Singh and others, reported in (2010) 6 SCC 786, relied upon by
learned counsel for the respondents tenants, the Supreme Court has
observed that while considering the application for condonation of
delay, no straight jacket formula is prescribed to come to the
conclusion that if sufficient and good grounds have been made out or
not. Each case has to be weighed from its facts and the
circumstances in which the party acts and behaves. From the
conduct, behaviour and attitude of the appellant, it cannot be said
that it had been absolutely callus and negligent in prosecuting the
matter, for after it became aware of non appearance of its counsel, it
prosecuted the matter with due diligence. The Supreme Court has
also observed that the delay is not so huge so as to warrant
dismissal on such hyper-technical ground or which could not have
been condoned.