cites: 115334053

5. As far as quantum of compensation is concerned, Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 discussed the previous report of the Supreme Court in Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179; General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandara, (1996) 4 SCC 362; and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Charlie, (2005) 10 SCC 720, and laid down the multiplier applicable at various age groups. The same can be extracted in a tabulated form hereunder:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

5. As far as quantum of compensation is concerned, Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 discussed the previous report of the Supreme Court in Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179; General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandara, (1996) 4 SCC 362; and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Charlie, (2005) 10 SCC 720, and laid down the multiplier applicable at various age groups. The same can be extracted in a tabulated form hereunder:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 794 - S B Majmudar - Full Document

5. As far as quantum of compensation is concerned, Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 discussed the previous report of the Supreme Court in Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179; General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandara, (1996) 4 SCC 362; and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Charlie, (2005) 10 SCC 720, and laid down the multiplier applicable at various age groups. The same can be extracted in a tabulated form hereunder:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 4294 - G N Ray - Full Document

5. As far as quantum of compensation is concerned, Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 discussed the previous report of the Supreme Court in Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179; General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandara, (1996) 4 SCC 362; and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Charlie, (2005) 10 SCC 720, and laid down the multiplier applicable at various age groups. The same can be extracted in a tabulated form hereunder:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 1415 - Full Document

5. As far as quantum of compensation is concerned, Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 discussed the previous report of the Supreme Court in Sarla Dixit v. Balwant Yadav, (1996) 3 SCC 179; General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum v. Susamma Thomas (Mrs.) and Ors. (1994) 2 SCC 176; U.P. SRTC v. Trilok Chandara, (1996) 4 SCC 362; and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Charlie, (2005) 10 SCC 720, and laid down the multiplier applicable at various age groups. The same can be extracted in a tabulated form hereunder:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 541 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Search Results Page