Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.29 seconds)
Management Of Vishnu Sugar Mills ... vs Their Workmen Represented By Chini Mill ... on 9 March, 1960 cites

The Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd vs Their Workmen & Another on 12 February, 1960

Two points have been urged before us on behalf of the appellant. In the first place it is urged that the reference was incompetent as sugar was a controlled industry and only the Central Government could have made the reference and not the State Government. Secondly, it is urged that the order of the tribunal granting an increment of Rs. 30 per month to Ramkrishna Prasad was patently perverse and that there was no change in the status or emoluments of Ramkrishna Prasad by the creation of the new post and the employment of Babulal Parekh on it. So far as the question of the competence of the reference is concerned, we are of opinion that there is no force in it, A similar question was raised before this Court in The Bijoy Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Their Workmen and Another (1) and it was held there on the language of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, that before that provision could apply to a controlled industry there must be a notification by the Central Government for the purposes of s. 2(a)(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Section 2(a)(1) is in these terms-
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 9 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1