Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 40 (0.64 seconds)
Charan Singh Hembram And vs State Of Odisha And Others .... Opposite ... on 3 June, 2025 cites

Jagdish Ch. Patnaik & Ors. Etc., ... vs State Of Orissa & Ors., State Of Orissa & ... on 7 April, 1998

In our considered opinion, the law on the issue is correctly declared in Jagdish Ch. Patnaik [Jagdish Ch. Patnaik v. State of Orissa, (1998) 4 SCC 456 : 1998 SCC (L&S) 1156] and consequently we disapprove the norms on assessment of inter se seniority, suggested in N.R. Parmar [Union of India v. N.R. Parmar, (2012) 13 SCC 340 : (2013) 3 SCC (L&S) 711] .
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 101 - Full Document

Direct Recruit Class Ii Engineering ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 May, 1990

This principle has been built upon by a line of precedents starting with the decision of the Constitution Bench W.P.(C) No.37471 of 2020 and batch Page 61 of 68 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: CHITTA RANJAN BISWAL Designation: A.R.-Cum-Sr.Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Jun-2025 15:45:15 of this Court in Direct Recruit Class II Engg. Officers' Assn. v. State of Maharashtra, followed in Akhouri Sachindra Nath (supra), Dinesh Kumar Sharma (supra) and several other cases."
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 915 - L M Sharma - Full Document

State Of Bihar And Others Etc vs Akhouri Sachindra Nath And Others Etc on 19 April, 1991

This principle has been built upon by a line of precedents starting with the decision of the Constitution Bench W.P.(C) No.37471 of 2020 and batch Page 61 of 68 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: CHITTA RANJAN BISWAL Designation: A.R.-Cum-Sr.Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Jun-2025 15:45:15 of this Court in Direct Recruit Class II Engg. Officers' Assn. v. State of Maharashtra, followed in Akhouri Sachindra Nath (supra), Dinesh Kumar Sharma (supra) and several other cases."
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 119 - B C Ray - Full Document

K. Meghachandra Singh And 6 Ors vs Ningam Siro And 42 Ors on 24 May, 2019

29. It is true that, the principles in K. Meghachandra Singh and others (supra) has not been unsettled in Hariharan and others (supra) despite the matter is referred for adjudication to a larger Bench. Nonetheless, the question is of two sets of employees in the same cadre when appointed in the same calendar year, their W.P.(C) No.37471 of 2020 and batch Page 67 of 68 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: CHITTA RANJAN BISWAL Designation: A.R.-Cum-Sr.Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Jun-2025 15:45:15 merit has to be ascertained in order of their appointments made in the same year. So the conclusion is whoever saw the light of day earlier came into existence early than the other who came later and accordingly, the persons appointed earlier are treated as senior to those appointed later. The submissions of private Opposite Parties to stretch the meaning of the word 'year' as a 'recruitment year' other than the meaning defined in Section 2(1)(j) of the Rules is not found acceptable. So the seniority of the persons appointed to the cadre earlier on 27.1.2016 and 18.5.2016 are treated to be senior to the persons appointed subsequently in the same year. Thus the impugned Gradation List dated 11.6.2020, which is the subject matter of challenge in all the writ petitions, needs to be revised accordingly.
Gauhati High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 122 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Singh And Another vs Rajeev Nain Upadhyay And 24 Others on 4 December, 2019

For the said proposition, the Division Bench made detailed discussions in paras 46, 47, 48 and 49 of the judgment [Rajesh Kumar Singh v. Rajeev Nain Upadhyay, 2019 SCC OnLine All 4782] and relied upon a number of case laws. In our considered view, this issue was not at all relevant. The said issue does not arise in the present case. The appellants/original writ petitioners had never challenged the selection process. The challenge was only to preparation of the seniority list. As such, this discussion by the Division Bench is totally irrelevant."
Allahabad High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 3 - B Somadder - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next