Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)

Dcit, Circle-14(1)(2), Mumbai vs M/S Gmr Warora Energy Limited, Mumbai on 15 June, 2023

13.3 It was further contended that the assessee's reliance on section 37(1) of the Act was misconceived. The allowability of expenditure under section 37 operates in a different sphere from determination of ALP under section 92 of the Act. Even if an expenditure is commercially expedient and otherwise allowable, it must still comply with the arm's length principle where it arises from an international transaction. Therefore, the ld. CIT(TP) was correct in holding that section 37 considerations do not override Chapter X provisions. 13.4 The ld. DR also relied on the earlier decision of the Bangalore Tribunal in DCIT vs. GMR Airports Ltd., wherein it was held that SBLC commission borne by the assessee and not recovered from the AE constituted an international transaction liable for transfer pricing adjustment. In light of this binding precedent, it was all the more necessary for the TPO to examine the issue in detail, which he failed to do.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1