Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.29 seconds)

Samita Roy & Anr vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 2 May, 2023

It is true that in usual course of events the Election Commission and its functionaries becomes functus officio after the declaration of results and after issuance of the election certificate but the facts of the instant case are completely different from the facts of the case in the matter of Sabita Roy (supra), Sanjay Kumar (supra) and Basanti Devi (supra). In none of the above matters there was direction upon the counting officer not to proceed with the counting. The direction to stop counting is a clear indication that counting any further would be futile as there would be no finality to the result of counting and the figure arrived at is bound to be erroneous.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Territory Of Ladakh & Ors vs Jammu & Kashmir National Conference And ... on 14 August, 2023

The answer to the aforesaid questions lies in the decision lately delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Union Territory of Ladakh & Ors. vs. Jammu & Kashmir National Conference & Anr. reported in 2023 SCC Online SC 1140 wherein the Court held that the powers of the High Court vested under the Constitution cannot be abridged, excluded or taken away, being part of the basic structure of the Constitution. Availability of an alternative efficacious remedy is no bar to the exercise of high prerogative writ jurisdiction. The High Court, being a Constitutional Court, is not, by any stretch of imagination, precluded from issuing a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution when such direction does not violate any statutory provision.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 7 - Cited by 8 - N K Singh - Full Document

Basanti Devi vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 24 July, 2012

It is true that in usual course of events the Election Commission and its functionaries becomes functus officio after the declaration of results and after issuance of the election certificate but the facts of the instant case are completely different from the facts of the case in the matter of Sabita Roy (supra), Sanjay Kumar (supra) and Basanti Devi (supra). In none of the above matters there was direction upon the counting officer not to proceed with the counting. The direction to stop counting is a clear indication that counting any further would be futile as there would be no finality to the result of counting and the figure arrived at is bound to be erroneous.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - J Roy - Full Document
1